This is better than any soap opera ever seen. Bill Clinton’s ex-lover and former Dallas attorney Dolly Kyle wrote a tell-all book last year about her decades-long relationship with the would-be president of the United States.
In the book “Hillary the Other Woman,” Kyle explains that “Billy” is a self-described “sex addict” who’s “sick, sick need” has been enabled by Hillary who has actually “co-conspired” through her “terrorist” tactics. Kyle claims to have known Bill Clinton since high school and had a long-running affair with him from the mid-1970s until around 1991. She eventually sued Clinton for trying to block the publication of her book she said was “loosely based” on her sexual affair with him, a lawsuit which was thrown out by a judge in 1998. But her book is now out for the whole world to read.
We all know that Bill and Hillary are a vile couple, as the many scandals in their past have shown. But more salacious information about this evil duo has recently come to light through the pages of a 2016 book, The Other Woman, written by Dolly Kyle, who dated Bill Clinton as a teen and had an affair with him that lasted for decades.
Bill’s and Dolly’s History
Bill Clinton and Dolly Kyle became friends when they were both just entering puberty, in the 1960’s. They dated when they were kids then had a serious affair, staring in 1974, that lasted until the 1990’s. During that time Dolly learned a tremendous amount of intimate details about Bill’s personal life
Bill’s Life with Hillary
According to Dolly, Bill’s marriage to Hillary was something he dreaded, not enjoyed. As Dolly tells it, Bill was terribly unhappy in his marriage to Hillary. Dolly, who met Hillary in the 1970’s, describes Hillary as a hairy, greasy, smelly, pudgy woman with fat ankles and no fashion sense. At one point, when Dolly was giving a ride to Hillary in her car, Dolly was so overwhelmed with Hillary’s offensive odor that Dolly found it hard not to kick Hillary out of her car.
In her book Dolly also indicates that Hillary was a lesbian, and that Bill wanted to have a child with Hillary, whom Bill often called “The Warden,” in order to put an end to the many rumors that were circulating about their marriage being a sham.
Hillary’s Horrible Temper
Dolly explains in her book that Hillary had a famously vile temper. One story Dolly shared centers around Hillary erupting one night, after a lost congressional race in 1974, yelling at a Jewish campaign staffer and using an anti-Semitic slur.
Another of Dolly’s stories about Hillary’s mean spirit highlighted how, during an Arkansas Governor’s Mansion Easter egg hunt. During this particular Easter some children with developmental disabilities were taking part in the hunt. Despite the fact that the eggs had been “hidden” so that they would be easy to find, the hunt was taking too long for Hillary, who then, within earshot of the childrens’ parents, blasted out, “When are they gonna get those f-ing retards out of here?”
Bill the Sex Addict
Not surprisingly, Dolly writes in her book about Bill Clinton’s sex addiction.
According to Dolly, she and Bill were once talking about how Wilt Chamberlain, the famous basketball player, had bragged about having slept with 20,000 women. Bill apparently said, “That’s 10 times more than I’ve had.”
The End of the Affair
Bill’s and Dolly’s affair ended suddenly and harshly when, in the early 1990’s Dolly told Bill that a reporter had been questioning her about their relationship. According to Dolly, Bill said that he and Hillary would “destroy her” if she cooperated with the press. An article on the Daily Mail site quotes Dolly as saying, “When I warned him about this story, which I had no intention of cooperating with, his threat to me was, ‘If you cooperate with the media, we will destroy you’ … ‘Bam. I slammed the phone down. It rang immediately. Kept ringing, I didn’t answer it again.’”
In the book, she goes on to make claims about Hillary that are terrifying to read but not 100% surprising. She claims Bill’s marriage to Crooked Hillary was something he dreaded and not enjoyed. That Bill was terribly unhappy in his marriage to Hillary. Dolly, who herself met Hillary in the 1970’s also describes Hillary as a hairy, greasy, smelly, pudgy woman with fat ankles and no fashion sense. At one point she even describes in the book the time when she was giving Hillary a ride in her car, she claimed to be so overwhelmed by Hillary’s stench that she found it a struggle not to kick Crooked Hillary out of her car.WOW!
Multiple Democrats and especially those in the mainstream media had no issue whatsoever in publicly denouncing President Trump when the Access Hollywood “locker-room talk” tape surfaced about a month before the 2016 election in which Trump said “Bad Words,” but they are always ready and willing to give Bill Clinton and other Democrats a pass. To the point of actually rewriting history by teaching the new generation that Bill was impeached for getting oral sex in the White House from an intern and not for one count of perjury and another of obstruction of justice. To which he was fined, disbarred and lost his law license for.
Please share if you agree the Clinton’s need to disappear from public life….
Our President Donald Trump has received a beautiful endorsement Wednesday from a very noted evangelical supporter, Jerry Falwell who is not turning his back on the president.
“Finally a leader in WH. Jobs returning, N Korea backing down, bold truthful stmt about #charlottesville tragedy.So proud of @realdonaldtrump,” Liberty University President Jerry Falwell
Because of the honesty and love voiced by President Trump, the liberal Media went on the attack. Tuesday, Trump said both sides in the Charlottesville violence were to blame for letting unrest get out of hand. This is so true. Yes, the White Suprematists are wrong, but they had a legal permit issued to them by the City Council to march. The other side didn’t and came armed with bats. Our President said both sides are guilty of hate. That’s the real issue here. HATE. Hate killed that girl. Hate brought bats to try and kill others who had different, albeit evil views. If anyone is to be shamed for the provocation, it would appear that it would be the City Council in Charlottesville.
The answer isn’t taking up bats or pulling down statues. This is only the action of Fascism. The best way to come against the Radical White Supremacists are to ignore them. It cost a person their life and what did it gain? It only brought more division as the result.
Falwell is not the only major evangelical figure to support Trump.
On Sunday, amidst the liberal and RINO condemnation, Rev. Franklin Graham stood by him when he said these words:
“What about the politicians such as the city council who voted to remove a memorial that had been in place since 1924, regardless of the possible repercussions? How about the city politicians who issued the permit for the lawful demonstration to defend the statue? And why didn’t the mayor or the governor see that a powder keg was about to explode and stop it before it got started? Instead they want to blame President Donald J. Trump for everything,”
Again Graham further stated these words:
“Really, this boils down to evil in people’s hearts. Satan is behind it all. He wants division, he wants unrest, he wants violence and hatred. He’s the enemy of peace and unity. I denounce bigotry and racism of every form, be it black, white or any other. My prayer is that our nation will come together. We are stronger together, and our answers lie in turning to God,”
Now there will be people coming against these Evangelists.
As Christians it is imperative to stay on the side of right and not fall for the plans and schemes of the Elite Globalist Media and their sheep that follow their lying News reports.
By-the-way, take note of any so-called Republican politicians that would say anything negative about Trump right now. They are exposing their true beliefs! Vote them out!
Scaramucci, the new White House Communications Director, has stated that his number one priority is to stop the leaks coming out of the White House. Is Anthony Scaramucci the man to handle this?
He has a big job ahead of him. What type of person does it take to leak White House information? What is their goal? What is their gain? These three questions are paramount to finding these leakers.
You can count out new appointees and new hires by the Trump Administration. President Trump has always surrounded himself with loyalty. Without loyalty you get fired!
You can disregard any “true” Republican employees, they actually are sitting on the front line and see with their own eyes the success of the Trump Administration, they would not do anything that would make the President look bad to the public.
That leaves you with Democrat leaning employees hired prior to President Trump’s inauguration.
So far, we are still permitted to discriminate with people of a different political philosophy. My advise is to go through the voting history of the previous administration hirees and fire everyone that has any background with the democrat party. Everybody that has campaigned for the democrat party, everyone that donated to the democrat party. Fire every last one. Vet the new hires and make sure they have conservative values.
The only problem with this idea, is you would have to fire Anthony Scaramucci. In 2008, Scaramucci served as a fundraiser for Barack Obama. Not sure how much he raised but by September 2010, Scaramucci asked Obama at a CNBC Town Hall meeting ,when he was going to “stop whacking Wall Street like a piñata.” So maybe there is still hope.
Do you know what the difference between the leakers and our new leadership is? One word… Business. Trump’s administration are all leaders of the business world. The bureaucrat hirees in the White House are political animals, NOT BUSINESS PEOPLE! We have an exciting next couple of week ahead of us!
Hooray, we just got some victory! President Trump’s protection ban will be able to be implemented, minus a couple of details. It may sound like a partial reason to celebrate, but hey, this is just the first round.
The arguments will be heard by the court during the Supreme Court’s first session in October.
The Court appears to recognize the President’s broad authority to limit travel to the US by those who have no direct ties to the US.
“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision is a clear victory for our national security. It allows the travel suspension for the six terror-prone countries and the refugee suspension to become largely effective,” the president said in a statement.
The the order will take a direct hit on those who are less likely to have connections to the United States.
Three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — said they would have allowed the entirety of Trump’s travel ban to take effect while the court mulls the case.
The people admitted to U.S. universities or hired previously for work by American businesses may be exempt from Trump’s new visa restrictions, the justices concluded. Individuals having a close familial relationship is required.
“Today’s compromise will burden executive officials with the task of deciding — on peril of contempt — whether individuals from the six affected nations who wish to enter the United States have a sufficient connection to a person or entity in this country,” Thomas wrote, adding that it also would invite more litigation.
It’s not clear what action from Trump would be needed for parts of the directive to take effect.
Trump’s March directive said the visa ban would last 90 days and the refugee halt would run for 120 days. After the lower court injunctions, Trump issued a memo saying that no blocked part of his directive takes effect until “72 hours after all applicable injunctions are lifted or stayed with respect to that provision.”
“To avoid any confusion, the presidential memorandum issued last week will likely be amended to include a discussion of the waiver and reissued,” said Paul Virtue, a partner at law firm MayerBrown and former chief counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals turned down the Trump administration’s initial request to lift the injunction.
“The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C.,” President Donald Trump wrote on Twitter earlier this month. It is apparent that the President tried to comply with the 9th Court, but in so doing, they reneged on their request and turned him down.
The rewritten order Trump signed March 6 removed Iraq from the list of seven countries targeted for a 90-day suspension of visa issuance, leaving Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The 120-day halt to refugee admissions remained essentially the same.
Earlier this month, a three-judge 9th Circuit panel also ruled against the revised executive order, but it did so on the narrower ground that Trump hadn’t met the standards Congress set out in law to take the sorts of steps he did. The three judges — all Clinton appointees — left in place the core of the Hawaii judge’s injunction barring
The 9th Circuit did rein in the injunction issued out of Hawaii, giving the Trump administration the go-ahead to move forward with vetting studies and other internal reviews that are required under the presidential directive.
Trump’s more informal public statements about the litigation, often delivered through Twitter, have frequently complicated or undermined the arguments elite Justice Department attorneys were mustering in court to defend the travel ban.
Trump’s reference last month to the revised executive order as a “watered down, politically correct” version of the first undercut the federal government’s position that the revised directive was essentially independent of the first one and lacked any taint of religious discrimination that some saw in the earlier order.
The president’s statement also seemed to bolster critics’ arguments that the March order was indeed a version of the Muslim ban he promised during the campaign.
And Trump’s repeated use of the phrase “travel ban” to describe his orders seems to be at tension with Justice Department arguments that the actions did not amount to a complete change in government policy but only a “temporary pause” in travel while officials shore up the process for checking the backgrounds of those seeking to come to the United States.
1) The US must drastically reduce its emissions now, but China and India, the biggest polluters in the world, can continually increase their emissions to 2030 at which time they may or may not agree to comply with the agreement.
2) India, before it makes up it’s mind, demands to be paid 2.5 trillion dollars.
3) The US has to reduce our coal production. China and India does not and can increase it.
4) Russia can actually increase its emissions by 50%.
5) The US along with the rest of the developed world, have to pay hundreds of millions dollars into the United Nation’s climate fund with no guarantees that any other nation would do it. Given their existing track record with NATO and the UN, don’t expect that to happen.
How does this benefit the United States?
The above described agreement isn’t a contractual agreement, but it is a rape of the United States workers and taxpayers.
When China and India get serious about reducing carbon emissions, then maybe we could work some sort of fair deal. Meanwhile, I suggest they start with cleaning up New Dehli and Beijing.
Author: Diana Milligan
The American Health Care Act that was just passed by Congress and awaiting approval in the Senate, would replace America’s health insurance system.
Supporters of this bill explain that it would lower premiums and give Americans more choice.
The exciting thing is that it guts ObamaCare taxes. The cuts amount to $1 trillion.
Here are some of the major taxes elected for cuts.
1. Prescription drug tax:
The reason Obama never came against the Pharmaceutical companies ridiculously high costs on their products, was because he was able to glean more taxes. This tax has driven up the price of Prescription Dugs, adding to their already high price. By eliminating this tax it is expected to bring down much of this cost to consumers. 25 Billion cut here.
2. Individual mandate tax:
The Republican led House bill would abolish this tax – which millions of Americans pay every year. According to HealthCare. gov, that translates to at least $695+ per adult. Instead, to protect the system and make [Read More…]
There is no question that there needed to be some serious changes made to the serious changes caused by what is known as ObamaCare. Premiums are spiking all over the country at rates that are unprecedented. Originally the party that invoked this Healthcare bill 100% along party lines, promised rates to drop by $2500 per year, per family. Unfortunately, this never happened. Instead premiums rose, deductibles rose, in many cases we lost access to our preferred doctors, wait times increased and then to make it even more hard on the people the “TAX” kicked in… [read more]
Republicans were able to pass the American Health Care Act presented in the House of Representatives on Thursday.
This is a huge step in dismantling the Obama Health Care, so-called Affordable Health Care, which ended up not being true.
It’s been a struggle because the Democrats are staying partisan and refusing to vote for any bill coming from the Republican-held house. The Democrats still defend Obama’s law, saying it’s one of his crowning domestic achievements. They said the GOP measure would toss millions off coverage while delivering tax cuts to the wealthy; their usual rhetoric.
The American Health Care Act would retain the requirement that families who want the policies to cover grown children until age 26, could still have it, but states could get federal waivers freeing insurers from other Obama Health Care coverage requirements.
The bill would block federal payments to Planned Parenthood, considered a triumph by many anti-abortion Republicans.
GOP candidates including Trump put repealing Obama’s statute at the top of their campaign pledges, contending it’s a failing system that’s leaving people with rising co-pays and tens of thousands in deductibles. Premiums going sky high and no access to care. It’s imploding.
A CBO estimate for the cost of latest version of their bill was not ready before the House vote.
Earlier this week, moderates objected that constituents with pre-existing conditions could effectively be denied coverage by insurers charging them exorbitant premiums, but GOP leaders seemed to win over a most the lawmakers after adding $8 billion over five years for state high-risk pools, aimed at helping seriously ill people pay un-affordable premiums. That was on top of $130 billion already in the bill for states.
Beaten Democrats insisted Republicans will pay at election time for repealing major provisions of the law. They sang the pop song “Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye” to the GOP lawmakers as the end of the voting neared. The Republicans seemed unworried, many of them busing to the White House for a victory appearance.
The measure skirted through the House by a slim 217-213 vote, due to Democrats refusing to vote for it and 20, mostly moderate Republican holdouts voted no. Republicans are looking seriously on not re-electing these hold-outs because they imperiled the American public by refusing to get rid of Obamacare Care.
Passage was due to a terrific amount of discussions by the White House and Republican leaders, that nailed down the final support needed. Leaders encouraged the congressmen at a closed-door meeting early Thursday by playing “Eye of the Tiger,” the motivating 1980s song from the “Rocky III” film.
“Many of us are here because we pledged to cast this very vote,” Ryan said. He added, “Are we going to keep the promises that we made, or are we going to falter?”
The bill now faces the Senate, where GOP lawmakers say changes are likely.
US citizen, Aya Hijazi, a 30 year old humanitarian worker and her husband, Mohamed Hassanein and four other charity workers were released from an Egyptian prison during the first 100 days of the Trump Administration. They had been in prison since May 1, 2014. Did you hear about this on the news?
This is an amazing story. Aya is an Egyptian American charity worker from Falls Church, Va. who was jailed in Cairo, Egypt for three years without ever having a trial. (the Egyptian constitution does not grant rights to speedy trial) She returned home to the United States late Thursday on the 20th of April, 2017 after the President Trump’s administration negotiated her release. President Trump himself spoke with Egyptian President Abdel Fatah al-Sissi to insure the immediate release.
Aya is the founder, along with her husband, of the Belady Foundation, a refuge center for homeless street children in Cairo.
The couple and their co-workers charged with child abuse and trafficking charges. These accusations have been long dismissed by human rights workers and U.S. officials. There was never any evidence presented against any of the parties. For three years hearings were canceled or delayed and Human rights groups were calling for the US to step in for years. The Obama Administration tried to negotiate their release for 3 years. It took Donald Trump 2 weeks and a little reverse psychology.
Trump recently has been moving to reset U.S. relations with Egypt. He invited Sissi to the White House and on April 3, Sissi met with President Trump. Later Trump publicly praised the Egyptian President for doing a “fantastic” job and offered the U.S. government’s “strong backing” On Sunday the 16th of April a court in Cairo dropped all charges against Aya and the others and released them. Trump sent a plane to pick them up and deliver them to Washington DC.
This guy is amazing! Why don’t we hear about this all over the place? This is a big deal. The reason is clear. The mainstream media will do everything in their power to avoid any news about Trump that is positive. Especially if it makes Obama appear as the ridiculously weak negotiator that he was.
This is how a BOSS takes care of things!
This is how a community organizer handles things.
Share this story everywhere! This needs to get out there! GO TRUMP!!!
President Donald Trump is fulfilling his promise of protecting American citizens. His Administration is cracking down on sanctuary cities that refuse to keep federal immigration laws or federal authorities. The Justice Department is forcing nine different communities to actually prove they are keeping the immigration laws before they continue receiving much desired law enforcement monetary aide from the federal government. Letters were sent Friday to places its inspector general has identified. These particular places apparently have rules limiting the information that can be provided to federal immigration authorities. They include New York, Philadelphia California and Chicago. Those in political power must provide proof from an attorney that they are following the law. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has repeated the threats he has made to crack down on these so-called sanctuary communities and states, blocking all federal monies that could end up crippling their economies. Perhaps then, these liberals will begin to realize that it is imperative to keep the laws of our country, rather than turning into lawless unprotecting leaders.
Contributed by: “DC” with Let Freedom Ring on 04/22/2017